May 28, 2007
Utilizing Employees as Volunteers
When employees volunteer in their own workplace, it blurs the lines (factually and perceptually)
between employment and voluntary engagement. It can become very difficult to distinguish
between what employees do for salary and what they do voluntarily. This article looks at the
legal and management implications of allowing staff to volunteer within the same organizational
structure.
Click here.
May 23, 2007
Nonprofit Employees and Volunteers
Fair Labor Standards
Act (“FLSA”) provides that true volunteer activities
are not impeded or discouraged while minimizing the
risk that the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime
requirements were being abused by employers. Amending the act in 1985, Congress made clear that a
volunteer may receive “no compensation,” but may be
paid “expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee.”
An individual will be considered a volunteer under the
FLSA if the individual:
(1) performs hours of service for a public agency for civic, charitable, or humanitarian reasons, without promise, expectation, or receipt of compensation for services rendered; although a volunteer can be paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee to perform such services;
(2) offers services freely and without pressure or coercion; and
(3) is not otherwise employed by the same public agency to perform the same type of services as those for which the individual proposes to volunteer. This last provision is explored in a newsletter available here.
(1) performs hours of service for a public agency for civic, charitable, or humanitarian reasons, without promise, expectation, or receipt of compensation for services rendered; although a volunteer can be paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee to perform such services;
(2) offers services freely and without pressure or coercion; and
(3) is not otherwise employed by the same public agency to perform the same type of services as those for which the individual proposes to volunteer. This last provision is explored in a newsletter available here.
May 17, 2007
Type III Supporting Organizations - Attorney Comments
Attorney Ruth Madrigal of Caplan & Drysdale wrote an open letter to Treasury Tax Legislative Counsel Susan Brown. In it, she discusses how any forthcoming guidance regarding Type III Supporting Organizations that support governmental entities should take into consideration the special circumstances that affect such organizations' abilities to meet the new "functionally integrated" requirements imposed by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Full Text
May 15, 2007
Service to Provide Technical Guidance on PPA for TEOs
Notice 2007-45 provides interim guidance on section 6104(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Section 6104(d)(1)(A)(ii) imposes a new requirement on all organizations exempt under section 501(a) and described in section 501(c)(3) to make available for public inspection a copy of their Form 990-T filed with the IRS. It will be published in IRB 2007-22 dated May 29, 2007.
May 14, 2007
IRS Guidance on Public Inspection of Form 990-T
Notice 2007-45 gives interim IRS guidance on section 6104(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The Act imposed new requirement on all organizations exempt under section 501(a) and described in section 501(c)(3) to make their Form 990-T available for public inspection. Full text.
May 11, 2007
IRS Guidance on Telephone Refund for Churches and Nonprofits
The annual May 15 filing deadline is here for many nonprofits, and the IRS urges any of these organizations that paid the three percent telephone tax to be sure to request this special refund. The telephone tax refund is also available to churches and small tax-exempt organizations that don’t normally file annual returns with the IRS. Get details and additional links in news release IR-2007-99.
May 09, 2007
Guidance on Conflicts of Interest
Council on Foundations Issues Conflicts Guidance. When a foundation shares board members with grantees, is this simply mutual benefit or does it create a conflict of interest? The Council on Foundations has asked its members to ponder this issue, and it shares some of their opinions in a recent article. No surprises here: There are two sides to every story. As long as appropriate precautions are in place, grantees and grantors can all benefit. But if there are any concerns about the perception of favoritism or personal benefits, boards might want to reconsider this practice. Click Here
May 02, 2007
Foreign Gifts
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has posted a helpful risk-management grid to guide nonprofit organizations involved in international activities. This tool focuses on grantmaking and is designed to help charities (including foundations) comply with U.S. sanctions that prohibit transactions with suspected terrorists. The grid not only helps identify potential illegal activity or abuse but also serves as an additional due diligence tool. See Guide
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)